diff options
author | Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> | 2002-01-08 08:29:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> | 2002-01-08 08:29:00 +0000 |
commit | 85a9b4ed19deecb22be379bd54f08e7edaf78ae1 (patch) | |
tree | d865d7dbe45dac7b5b12056647f8d5b57b06ec81 /doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi | |
parent | 3969f6ca0639bc5fa9898d076a55e3488617fb25 (diff) | |
download | guile-85a9b4ed19deecb22be379bd54f08e7edaf78ae1.tar.gz |
Spell check.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi b/doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi index 5c68bf772..23786b3bf 100644 --- a/doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi +++ b/doc/ref/scheme-binding.texi @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Here the enclosing form is a @code{let}, so the @code{define}s in the internal definitions is the @strong{complete} body of the @code{let}-expression, the @code{lambda}-expression which gets bound to the variable @code{banana} may refer to the variable @code{apple}, -even thogh it's definition appears lexically @emph{after} the definition +even though it's definition appears lexically @emph{after} the definition of @code{banana}. This is because a sequence of internal definition acts as if it were a @code{letrec} expression. @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ with duplicate bindings. @node Binding Reflection @section Querying variable bindings -Guile provides a procedure for checking wehther a symbol is bound in the +Guile provides a procedure for checking whether a symbol is bound in the top level environment. If you want to test whether a symbol is locally bound in expression, you can use the @code{bound?} macro from the module @code{(ice-9 optargs)}, documented in @ref{Optional Arguments}. |